Choosing and Checking a Model
Turn failure probabilities into inspection decisions
False alarms now cost more than misses
The component probabilities are already estimated. Botie's action threshold must reflect the supplied false-alarm and missed-failure costs.
BOTIE
The inputs we are comparing
Estimated failure probabilities
Misses cost more
- 00.1
- 10.4
- 20.8
False alarms cost more
- 00.2
- 10.5
- 20.6
- 30.9
False-alarm cost
Misses cost more
1
False alarms cost more
3
Missed-failure cost
Misses cost more
4
False alarms cost more
2
Result for misses cost more
- 00
- 11
- 21
False alarms have zero cost in this toy policy
This check uses the pieces from “Apply the cost-derived inspection policy”.
BOTIE
- Estimated failure probabilities
- 00
- 10.01
- 20.4
- False-alarm cost
0
- Missed-failure cost
5
Use a number, text, or an array matching the requested result. For a matrix, put each row in brackets. Saving your prediction runs your current construction on these inputs and checks the earlier examples too.
Build a construction in the workspace above first. This case will test those pieces.
Which assumptions about probability quality and correct-decision costs make this threshold valid, and why would different assumptions require a new derivation?
Choose actions using credible probabilities and an explicit cost model rather than treating a default cutoff as universal.
This assumes credible probabilities, nonnegative costs with a positive sum, and zero cost for correct decisions. Different cost tables require a different derivation.
Work through the Python challenges →